Tags: deposited metadata read as is from the PDB entry or NAKB · tool-derived computed by a published tool (x3dna-dssr, US-align, PLIP, RDKit) · geometry-derived computed here from the deposited coordinates and sequences (gemmi, NumPy, Biopython).
| Feature | What you see | How it is made |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Information | Overview numbers (next rows), each structure's PDB details, ligand properties | RCSB Data API (read live) and Chemical Component Dictionary; RDKit for ligand properties deposited metadatatool-derived |
| Global / pocket RMSD | apo→holo C3′ RMSD over all binding-site chains (global) or over the residues within 8 Å of the ligand (pocket) | after the superposition below geometry-derived |
| TM-score | fold similarity of the ligand's host chain, normalised by the holo length. Under ~30 nt it tracks chain length, so a low value there does not mean a different fold | US-align tool-derived |
| Radius of gyration | size of the fitted chains, apo → holo, over the residues modelled in both | C3′ atoms, NumPy geometry-derived |
| Ligand burial | share of the ligand surface covered by RNA in the holo complex | Shrake–Rupley surface area, Biopython geometry-derived |
| Functional type | the most specific functional class of the host chain; Unannotated when NAKB gives none | NAKB deposited metadata |
| Sequence alignment | apo and holo lined up residue by residue; faded letters are declared but not modelled | Needleman–Wunsch on the declared (SEQRES) sequences geometry-derived |
| Per-residue displacement | how far each nucleotide's C3′ atom moved; one chart per binding-site chain, all in the same frame | distance after the superposition below geometry-derived |
| 3D superposition + morph | the apo overlaid on the holo, and the morph from apo to holo (an entry without a morph says so) | one rigid Kabsch fit on the paired C3′ atoms of all binding-site chains (residues paired by sequence, one apo chain per holo chain). The morph is a straight-line interpolation for display, not a simulation geometry-derived |
| Secondary structure (2D) | apo and holo base pairing; click a base to find it in 3D · what DSSR extracts ↓ | x3dna-dssr tool-derived |
| Conformational dashboard | one cell per holo nucleotide: displacement colour, binding-site marker, motif band | displacement + x3dna-dssr motifs geometry-derivedtool-derived |
| Base-pair rewiring | base pairs formed, disrupted or unchanged on binding | x3dna-dssr pairs of both structures, matched through the sequence alignment tool-derived |
| Ligand interactions (3D) · Interaction data | H-bonds, π-stacking, halogen bonds, ligand–metal coordination and residue distances; tables of base pairs, interactions, H-bonds, rewiring and motifs | H-bonds: x3dna-dssr (PLIP when DSSR cannot read the ligand). π-stacking, halogen bonds, metal coordination: PLIP. Distances: gemmi tool-derivedgeometry-derived |
the sequence and dot-bracket of each chain → the Secondary structure (2D) diagram.
every pair, canonical and non-canonical, with its Leontis–Westhof and Saenger class → the Base pairing table and Base-pair rewiring.
stems, hairpin, internal and bulge loops, junctions and single strands → the Structural motifs table and the motif colouring.
Each base has three edges: Watson–Crick, Hoogsteen and Sugar. A pair is named by its glycosidic orientation (cis or trans) and the two edges in contact, giving 12 families. cWW is the standard A–U, G–C or G–U pair; tHS is a common non-canonical pair. Non-canonical pairs, which dot-bracket cannot show, still appear in the Base pairing table.
Questions, corrections, bug reports, or an apo–holo pair we missed? Email yanjun.li@ufl.edu and jiang.shiyu@ufl.edu; we respond to data corrections promptly. To analyse your own apo and holo structures, use Query.